The Aggressive Brain: Decoding the Science of Aggression, from Trauma to Treatment

Don't scream in your pillow

“The fallen angle” by Alexandre Cabanel

Anybody can become angry, that is easy, but to be angry with the right person and to the right degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, and in the right way, that is not within everybody's power and is not easy — Aristotle

In the last article (The Aggressive Brain: Can We Predict Violence from Neural Activity?) we learnt what we actually understand by aggression and how this can be recognised through dysfunctional neural patterns. We learnt that aggression can be relatively well predicted through neurobiological and genetic markers as well as knowledge about a person's environment. However, the question remained open as to what we should now do with these people...

So we know a person tends towards pathological aggressive behaviour, has the risk of becoming violent or committing criminal acts, but what do we do now? How do we deal with aggression? What might we learn from this for our own lives; how can we alleviate our own anger?

---

The Catharsis Hypothesis: Acting Out or Regulating Aggression?

A widespread belief is that we can reduce anger by acting it out, for example on a punching bag or at the gym. This principle goes back to the so-called catharsis hypothesis. The theory is: aggressive actions lead to a temporary reduction of further aggression because drive energy has been discharged and must first regenerate.

In reality, however, modern research points in a completely different direction. Regarding the catharsis hypothesis, it was found that acting out aggression does not lead to a reduction in the affective state at all. Quite the contrary: acting out anger actually increases this state (Bushman et al., 1999).

From this finding we can learn the following: interventions against aggression and anger should be based on a reduction of arousal, that is, calming rather than acting out aggression. For each of us personally, this means: are you angry? Better not hit the punching bag, but meditate instead!

---

Let us now turn to interventions for pathological aggression. What can therapists do in the professional clinical context to alleviate aggression?

I should add that while writing, I got a bit carried away and this article became more empirical than I had originally planned. For anyone who enjoys psychological research, I hope you have fun!

---

Schema-Therapeutic Approaches and the Cause of Aggression

Schema therapy offers an integrative model which assumes that early maladaptive schemas (EMS) developed early in life, profound, negative beliefs about oneself, others and the world, control dysfunctional behaviour, including aggression (Keulen-de Vos et al., 2013).

Specifically, a schema is a stably anchored "thought model" consisting of dysfunctional beliefs ("I am incompetent and do everything wrong") and closely related feelings, perceptions and memories. This often arises based on an innate temperament in childhood when one or more of the central human basic needs are not met (e.g., the need for attachment). The schema triggers certain patterns of action and thinking - "coping modes" - which usually serve the purpose of indirectly fulfilling the frustrated basic need (e.g., for attachment) or compensatorily fulfilling another basic need (e.g., for autonomy and control). This means that aggressive behaviour in this model is often understood as a maladaptive coping mode (specifically as overcompensation) that serves as a reaction to the activation of painful, underlying schemas (Keulen-de Vos et al., 2013). Precisely because of this "substitute gain", schemas also function neurobiologically as attractors; they fulfil needs and satisfy one, albeit maladaptively.

In schema-therapeutic treatment, the goal is to dissolve these schemas. Often, with the help of experiential techniques such as imagination exercises and chair dialogues as well as a therapeutic relationship strongly focused on corrective emotional experience, the unmet emotional basic needs from childhood that underlie the schemas are addressed. The effectiveness of this method lies in its diagnostic "clarification". For it enables a more nuanced analysis not only of the reasons why a person tends towards aggression. This also means that it can be a good tool to be used in collaboration with other methods as a diagnostic lens (Keulen-de Vos et al., 2013).

A study on adolescent girls with self-harming behaviour found that a schema therapy intervention had positive effects on both aggression and emotional dysregulation (Ramshe et al., 2023). Another study confirmed the positive effect of schema therapy on both physical and verbal aggression in adolescents (Sabet et al., 2016). Overall, the evidence base is still rather thin: there are only few studies with positive effects, mostly with young samples and small case numbers. For personality disorders, which frequently involve aggression problems, the effectiveness of schema therapy is however moderately documented (Steinert & Hirsch, 2020; Zhang et al., 2023).

Societally, however, we can also derive an important conclusion from this analytical approach. Aggression is often a compensation mechanism for early-experienced trauma. Thus we can establish at the societal level: aggression prevention is above all, trauma prevention (Bohleber et al., 2022; SRF, 2024). This means preventing aggression often begins with fostering secure, supportive environments for children and promoting emotional literacy in education and society at large

---

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)

If schema therapy is about the "why," Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is the "how-to" manual for change. It is considered the gold-standard, empirically founded first-line treatment for anger, with its effectiveness supported by a mountain of evidence from numerous meta-analyses (Beck & Fernandez, 1998; Iruthayarajah et al., 2018).

The case for CBT is overwhelming. In a foundational meta-analysis of 40 studies on children, Sukhodolsky et al. (2004) found a significant effect, noting that techniques like modeling, feedback, and problem-solving tasks were particularly effective at reducing anger. The numbers are just as compelling for adults. A massive meta-analysis of 50 studies found an effect size of d = 0.70, meaning the average person treated with CBT was better off than 76% of those in untreated control groups (Beck & Fernandez, 1998). This holds true even in challenging populations; other research confirmed a large effect (1.14) in adolescents with severe aggression (Hoogsteder et al., 2015), and in adult male offenders, CBT-based programs were shown to reduce the general recidivism rate by 23% and the rate for violent crimes by 28% (Henwood et al., 2015).

Simply put, CBT offers a powerful, data-backed arsenal of techniques to retrain the aggressive brain.

---

Biological and Somatic Interventions

Pharmacological Approaches

Since pathological aggression is fundamentally related to the function of the limbic system (including amongst others the amygdala and hypothalamus), which are important for processing emotions including anger. In addition to subcortical regions, neocortical regions are also relevant, especially the prefrontal cortex, which integrates sensory and affective signals and is responsible for impulse control. Functional disorders in these areas or their connections impair emotion regulation, inhibition and can promote aggressive behaviour (Lane et al., 2011). Neurotransmitter pathways including GABAergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic also seem relevant for modulating aggressive behaviour (Fava, 1997). Therefore, it is only logical that neuropsychiatric approaches have also tried to find suitable pharmaceutical agents against aggression.

While there is no single "aggression pill," a range of medications can help rebalance brain chemistry. Although there are many case reports and open studies on medications for aggression, only few double-blind, placebo-controlled studies exist for chronic aggressive behaviour (Lane et al., 2011).

Antipsychotics like risperidone and olanzapine can produce significant improvements, particularly in patient groups like those with Alzheimer's, though they come with side effects (Ballard & Howard, 2006). The mood stabilizer Lithium is often effective for impulsive or affective aggression, but its narrow therapeutic window requires careful blood monitoring (Malone et al., 1998). Perhaps the best-researched medications are anticonvulsants; early double-blind studies showed that phenytoin, for example, significantly reduced impulsive aggression in violent prisoners (Barratt et al., 1997). Furthermore, common SSRIs like fluoxetine and citalopram have shown positive results in reducing verbal aggression and anger in patients with personality disorders (Coccaro & Kavoussi, 1997; Kamarck et al., 2009). Even beta-blockers have been suggested for use in some cases, such as in persons with brain lesions (Fleminger et al., 2006). In summary, while pharmacotherapy is a viable option, it is typically reserved for when non-pharmacological measures fail due to side effects and other limitations (Lane et al., 2011).

Nutritional Supplements

Not only through medications, but also through targeted nutrient supplementation, aggression can potentially be reduced. However, research on this is still in its infancy and the number of reliable studies is rather limited. The focus of previous work is mainly on vitamins, minerals as well as macronutrients such as fatty acids and amino acids.

Recent meta-analyses report promising effects of several nutrient interventions: S-Adenosyl-Methionine (SAM-e) showed moderate effects, presumably through supporting serotonergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission (Qureshi et al., 2021). Omega-3 fatty acids showed small to medium effect sizes in several studies (Qamar et al., 2023; Qureshi et al., 2021; Raine et al., 2016). A meta-analysis by Gajos and Beaver (2016) supported these findings and concluded that omega-3 could not only effectively reduce aggression but also represent a particularly cost-effective remedy. Consistent with this, another study showed that higher aggression is associated with lower omega-3 status (Choy, 2023). Tryptophan, a serotonin precursor, also led to small but significant effects, especially in persons with high trait aggression (Qureshi et al., 2021). Multi-nutrient supplementations also slightly reduced stress and anxiety, which can indirectly reduce aggression (Qamar et al., 2023; Qureshi et al., 2021).

This approach seems particularly relevant in young people, as adaptive aggression regulation depends on healthy neural development, especially on the balance of subcortical (bottom-up) and cortical (top-down) processes (Qamar et al., 2023). These require adequate nutrient supply: Omega-3 fatty acids are particularly important because they represent basic building blocks of neural membranes, whilst micronutrients act as cofactors in neurotransmitter synthesis (Qamar et al., 2023). Suboptimal supply can thus be improved through supplementation or dietary change. Nevertheless, it should be emphasised that the current study situation is overall still heterogeneous and methodically limited, which is why the evidence should be interpreted cautiously.

Neuromodulation: Non-invasive Stimulation and Neuropeptides

Non-invasive neuromodulatory procedures (NIBS) aim to directly influence the activity of specific brain areas without invasively intervening in the brain. A prominent example is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in which a weak electrical current is applied via electrodes on the scalp to modulate the excitability of neurons.

However, the findings on the effectiveness of these methods for aggression are complex and partly contradictory. Thus, an extensive meta-analysis from 2025, which summarised 93 effect sizes from 25 experiments, found no significant overall effect of tDCS on anger and aggression (Denson et al., 2025). Separate analyses of the most frequently stimulated target regions in the prefrontal cortex also showed no significant effects. In contrast, another systematic review by Casula et al. (2023) highlights promising effects of NIBS procedures such as tDCS, rTMS and cTBS in various participant groups. The authors emphasise that success depends strongly on the exact stimulation site and the chosen method, with rTMS and cTBS sometimes showing opposite effects compared to tDCS.

This heterogeneity in findings can be explained by methodological differences, for example in procedures for aggression measurement or through limited sample sizes. According to Knehans et al. (2022), future research should therefore improve the localisation and specificity of NIBS through the use of neuro-navigational instruments as well as through standardised assessment methods to increase the comparability of results.

In summary, Knehans et al. (2022) conclude that the current study situation is heterogeneous but shows clear potential for NIBS: depending on method and stimulation site, neural activity in aggression-relevant brain regions can be specifically modulated.

---

Emotion and Mindfulness-Focused Approaches

Emotion Regulation/Emotion-Focused Therapy

These approaches view problematic anger and aggression as consequences of difficulties in processing and regulating emotions. The therapeutic goal consists of supporting clients in recognising, tolerating and transforming maladaptive primary emotions (e.g., shame, fear, sadness) that frequently underlie reactive anger (Pascual-Leone & Paivio, 2013).

Overall, there are various methods that can be counted as emotion-focused therapy. For example, a study on "Compassion-Focused Therapy" showed positive effects regarding the reduction of aggression in adolescents (Damavandian et al., 2022).

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) can also be considered part of these therapy forms. ACT focuses specifically on increasing psychological flexibility by having clients learn to accept difficult inner experiences such as anger rather than fighting them, whilst simultaneously committing to value-oriented action. A randomised controlled study (N = 101) that dealt specifically with aggression in partnerships showed the effectiveness of this approach impressively: an ACT group intervention led to significantly stronger reductions in both psychological and physical aggression compared to a non-specific control group (support and discussion). These effects remained stable even six months after treatment end (Zarling et al., 2015). There are also positive findings for emotion-focused therapy for aggression in partnerships (Amini, Jafarinia et al., 2021).

Overall, however, it must be noted that the study situation regarding specific effects of emotion-focused therapy is rather thin (Hasani Rad et al., 2025).

Mindfulness

Mindfulness therapy comes from the East Asian region. It aims to become non-judgementally, consciously aware of inner thought processes, to accept them and to consciously direct them. This pause in the thought process is intended to lead to individuals reflecting on their thoughts and feelings, including arising anger, which in turn should prevent emotional reactivity and impulsivity as fuel for aggression.

The effectiveness of this principle is supported by a meta-analysis of 17 studies (N=6,722) that found a significant negative correlation between mindfulness and aggressive behaviour with a small effect size (-0.270) (Utami & Yudiarso, 2023). Another systematic analysis by Fix and Fix (2013) and Gillions et al. (2019) confirmed this positive finding. However, they also found that many mindfulness studies have weaknesses in methodology and presentation of results. More high-quality controlled studies with greater transparency are therefore necessary to confirm this positive effect

Psychosocial Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence

Intimate relationships are a frequent scene of aggression, with women in particular being affected by violence in partnerships. Estimates suggest that about 30% of all women have already experienced violence from their partner (Turner et al., 2020). To address this problem, special intervention programmes have been developed, also known as "Batterer Intervention Programs" (BIP) or "Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs" (DAIP). A central feature of these programmes is the coordinated community response.

These interventions are particularly widespread in Western countries (Murphy & Richards, 2021). Given this broad application, the question of their effectiveness in reducing violence is of crucial importance for public health and safety.

Despite their wide distribution, the scientific evidence for the effectiveness of these programmes is inconsistent (Murphy & Richards, 2021). Whilst quasi-experimental studies found small to moderate positive effects, the evidence from more rigorous experimental studies is limited. A meta-analysis found that the recidivism rate among intervention participants was 35%, compared to 40% in the control group, a slight but positive effect (Murphy & Richards, 2021). Recent studies could indeed replicate these small positive results (Murphy & Richards, 2021), however meta-analyses criticise the often poor methodology and study selection of previous research and demand higher quality for the future (Murphy & Richards, 2021; Turner et al., 2020).

Thus Turner et al. (2020) draw the following conclusion:

Despite the noted limitations, we regard our evidence as clear recommendation that efforts to further develop and implement IPV interventions in affected communities continue and receive adequate resource provision.

Virtual Reality Approaches

A new, very innovative approach against aggression is the application of Virtual Reality (VR) to treat aggression. This approach has already been developed for use in the forensic field. The method is called Virtual Reality Aggression Prevention Training (VRAPT) (González Moraga et al., 2022). Through VR there is the possibility to recreate situations as realistically as possible and actively apply aggression management training to simulated situations. This improved the ecological validity of training that can normally only be implemented in therapeutic or laboratory environments. In its current implementation, the VR environment is mainly combined with CBT. The goal is to practise awareness and control over one's own aggression and that of other persons in virtual situations that can be tailored to individual needs (González Moraga et al., 2022).

In the study by Klein Tuente et al. (2020), a significant reduction in hostility and impulsivity as well as improved anger control could be demonstrated for VRAPT. However, the intervention did not lead to a statistically significant decrease in self- or other-rated aggression. Furthermore, the improvements proved not to be sustainable in the three-month follow-up. The authors conclude that VRAPT is indeed a potentially effective approach, but its methods and implementation must be further developed to achieve long-term and generalised effects. Promising changes have also already been made (González Moraga et al., 2022) and new studies are already finding a promising, positive trend in effectiveness (Ivarsson et al., 2023).

Why is that important? The Societal Imperative

What we have now learned is that there are indeed multiple valid methods to reduce aggression in humans. This knowledge carries profound implications for how we approach human behavior in the future. When it becomes possible to predict violent behaviors through aggression-related genes (such as MAOA-L variants) we talked about in the previous article, we will need to implement therapeutic intervention techniques. We should help affected individuals just as we do with other pathological behaviors, recognizing aggression not as a moral failing but as a treatable condition. This is the conclusion we should draw: aggressiveness can be predicted, and in its pathological form, it represents a dysfunctional brain function that we should treat and prevent. Just as we approach depression, anxiety, or addiction as medical conditions requiring intervention, excessive aggression should be understood through the same therapeutic lens. This reframing moves us away from purely punitive responses toward addressing root causes rather than merely managing consequences.

From an economic perspective, society pays an enormous price for untreated aggression. The costs include criminal justice systems, incarceration, victim support services, medical treatment for violence-related injuries, and lost productivity. Violence costs developed nations hundreds of millions annually, making investment in aggression prevention and treatment economically sensible while improving quality of life. But the implications extend far beyond crime prevention. By addressing aggression systematically, we might prevent not only individual violent acts but also larger-scale conflicts, including wars between nations. International conflicts often arise from the same psychological patterns that drive interpersonal violence: competition for resources, fear-based decision-making, and dehumanization of others.

This means there are multiple compelling reasons to prioritize the treatment and research of aggression as well as the prevention of trauma that causes such behaviour on an individual and societal level. We cannot only prevent crimes and violent behavior, but potentially also wars, creating a healthier society as a whole.

Given our growing understanding of aggression's biological basis and treatability, we face a moral obligation to act. The treatment of aggression represents one of the most promising paths toward creating not just a safer society, but a fundamentally healthier and more flourishing one. The question is no longer whether we can address aggression effectively, but whether we have the collective wisdom and will to make it a priority.

What can YOU take from this research? A personal Toolkit.

Besides pathological interventions, all of us can learn from this research in our personal life. Say you are angry, enraged because something particular happened, what should you take from this?

1. Mindful Awareness and Cognitive Processing Actively reflect on your aggression through mindful observation without judgment, as supported by mindfulness-based interventions research. Notice physical sensations, thoughts, and emotional intensity rather than suppressing them. This metacognitive awareness helps activate the prefrontal cortex, which can regulate the amygdala's fight-or-flight response. Don't judge, just notice and process your thoughts systematically.

2. Physiological Regulation Over Cathartic Release Avoid screaming into pillows or destroying objects, research indicates cathartic release methods can actually increase aggressive tendencies. Instead, focus on calming your nervous system through evidence-based techniques. Controlled breathing (4-7-8 pattern or box breathing) activates the parasympathetic nervous system. (Progressive muscle relaxation and grounding techniques can also help)

3. Nutritional and Biological Support Maintain adequate omega-3 fatty acids (EPA/DHA), as studies suggest they help regulate mood and reduce inflammatory responses linked to irritability. Regular sleep, exercise, and blood sugar stability significantly impact emotional regulation capacity.

4. Functional Analysis When Regulated Still angry? Consider that this might serve a purpose. Aggression is not integrated in our behaviour by accident. Aggression is not always wrong! It is an energy source, for situations when you need it.

5. Know When to Seek Support If anger feels overwhelming or impacts relationships/functioning, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have strong evidence bases for anger management.

Note I am not a therapist - these are evidence-based strategies:

References and Literature Suggestions

Amini, N., Jafarinia, G., et al. (2021). The Comparison of Effectiveness of Emotion-Focused Couple Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on Covert Relational Aggression of Couples. Iranian Evolutionary Educational Psychology Journal, 3(4), 583–595.

Ballard, C., & Howard, R. (2006). Neuroleptic drugs in dementia: benefits and harm. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(6), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1926

Barratt, E. S., Stanford, M. S., Felthous, A. R., & Kent, T. A. (1997). The effects of phenytoin on impulsive and premeditated aggression: a controlled study. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(5), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004714-199710000-00002

Bechdolf, A., Bühling-Schindowski, F., Weinmann, S., Baumgardt, J., Kampmann, M., Sauter, D., Jaeger, S., Walter, G., Mayer, M., Löhr, M., et al. (2022). DGPPN-Pilotstudie zur Implementierung der S3-Leitlinie „Verhinderung von Zwang: Prävention und Therapie aggressiven Verhaltens bei Erwachsenen “. Der Nervenarzt, 93(5), 450–458.

Beck, R., & Fernandez, E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of anger: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018763902991

Bohleber, W., Eilers, R., Elbert, T., Frigowitsch, E., Iffland, B., Kleim, B., Lorbeer, N., Meister, L., Neuner, F., Rentrop, M., et al. (2022). Traumafolgen: Forschung und therapeutische Praxis. Kohlhammer Verlag.

Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Stack, A. D. (1999). Catharsis, aggression, and persuasive influence: Self-fulfilling or self-defeating prophecies?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(3), 367.

Casula, A., Milazzo, B. M., Martino, G., Sergi, A., Lucifora, C., Tomaiuolo, F., Quartarone, A., Nitsche, M. A., & Vicario, C. M. (2023). Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Modulation of Aggressive Behavior—A Systematic Review of Randomized Sham-Controlled Studies. Life, 13(5), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13051220

Celofiga, A., Kores Plesnicar, B., Koprivsek, J., Moskon, M., Benkovic, D., & Gregoric Kumperscak, H. (2022). Effectiveness of De-Escalation in Reducing Aggression and Coercion in Acute Psychiatric Units: A Cluster Randomized Study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 856153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.856153

Choy, O. (2023). Nutritional factors associated with aggression. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1176061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1176061

Ciesinski, N. K., Himelein-Wachowiak, M., Krick, L. C., Sorgi-Wilson, K. M., Cheung, J. C. Y., & McCloskey, M. S. (2023). A systematic review with meta-analysis of cognitive bias modification interventions for anger and aggression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 167, 104344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2023.104344

Coccaro, E. F., & Kavoussi, R. J. (1997). Fluoxetine and impulsive aggressive behavior in personality-disordered subjects. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(12), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830240035005

Damavandian, A., Golshani, F., Saffarinia, M., & Baghdasarians, A. (2022). Effectiveness of compassion-focused therapy on aggression, self-harm behaviors, and emotional self-regulation in delinquent adolescents. Journal of Psychological Science, 21(112), 797–818.

Denson, T. F., Choy, O., Summerell, E., & Wong, I. (2025). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Anger and Aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 51(4), e70036. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.70036

DiGiuseppe, R., & Tafrate, R. C. (2003). Anger treatment for adults: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.10.1.70

Fava, M. (1997). Psychopharmacologic treatment of pathologic aggression. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20(2), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70321-x

Fix, R. L., & Fix, S. T. (2013). The effects of mindfulness-based treatments for aggression: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.009

Fleminger, S., Greenwood, R. J., & Oliver, D. L. (2006). Pharmacological management for agitation and aggression in people with acquired brain injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), CD003299. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003299.pub2

Gajos, J. M., & Beaver, K. M. (2016). The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on aggression: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews, 69, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.017

Gaynes, B. N., Brown, C. L., Lux, L. J., Brownley, K. A., Van Dorn, R. A., Edlund, M. J., Coker-Schwimmer, E., Weber, R. P., Sheitman, B., Zarzar, T., Viswanathan, M., & Lohr, K. N. (2017). Preventing and De-escalating Aggressive Behavior Among Adult Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Psychiatric Services, 68(8), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600314

Gillions, A., Cheang, R., & Duarte, R. (2019). The effect of mindfulness practice on aggression and violence levels in adults: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.012

González Moraga, F. R., Klein Tuente, S., Perrin, S., Enebrink, P., Sygel, K., Veling, W., & Wallinius, M. (2022). New developments in virtual reality-assisted treatment of aggression in forensic settings: the case of VRAPT. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 675004. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.675004

Hallett, N., & Dickens, G. L. (2017). De-escalation of aggressive behaviour in healthcare settings: Concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 75, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.003

Hasani Rad, S., Bavi, S., & Heidari, A. (2025). The Efficacy of Emotion-Focused Therapy on Distress Tolerance and Resilience in Female Students with Aggression Symptoms. Women’s Health Bulletin, 12(2), 137–145.

Henwood, K. S., Chou, S., & Browne, K. D. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of CBT informed anger management. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.011

Herpertz, S. C., Matzke, B., Hillmann, K., Neukel, C., Mancke, F., Jaentsch, B., Schwenger, U., Honecker, H., Bullenkamp, R., Steinmann, S., Krauch, M., Bauer, S., Borzikowsky, C., Bertsch, K., & Dempfle, A. (2020). A mechanism-based group-psychotherapy approach to aggressive behaviour in borderline personality disorder: findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Brain Injury, 7(1), e17. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.131

Honecker, H., Bertsch, K., Spieß, K., Krauch, M., Kleindienst, N., Herpertz, S. C., & Neukel, C. (2021). Impact of a Mechanism-Based Anti-Aggression Psychotherapy on Behavioral Mechanisms of Aggression in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 689267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689267

Hoogsteder, L. M., Stams, G. J. J. M., Figge, M. A., Changoe, K., van Horn, J. E., Hendriks, J., & Wissink, I. B. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of individually oriented Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) for severe aggressive behavior in adolescents. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.971851

Iruthayarajah, J., Alibrahim, F., Mehta, S., Janzen, S., McIntyre, A., & Teasell, R. (2018). Cognitive behavioural therapy for aggression among individuals with moderate to severe acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Epub 2018 Jul 9]. Brain Injury, 32(12), 1443–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1496481

Ivarsson, D., Delfin, C., Enebrink, P., & Wallinius, M. (2023). Pinpointing change in virtual reality assisted treatment for violent offenders: A pilot study of Virtual Reality Aggression Prevention Training (VRAPT). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1239066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1239066

Kamarck, T. W., Haskett, R. F., Muldoon, M., Flory, J. D., Anderson, B., Bies, R., Pollock, B., & Manuck, S. B. (2009). Citalopram intervention for hostility: results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014394

Keulen-de Vos, M., Bernstein, D. P., & Arntz, A. (2013). Schema therapy for aggressive offenders with personality disorders. Forensic CBT: A Handbook for Clinical Practice, 66–83.

Klein Tuente, S., Bogaerts, S., Bulten, E., Keulen-de Vos, M., Vos, M., Bokern, H., van IJzendoorn, S., Geraets, C. N. W., & Veling, W. (2020). Virtual Reality Aggression Prevention Therapy (VRAPT) versus Waiting List Control for Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(7), 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072258

Knehans, R., Schuhmann, T., Roef, D., Nelen, H., À Campo, J., & Lobbestael, J. (2022). Modulating Behavioural and Self-Reported Aggression with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Literature Review. Brain Sciences, 12(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020200

Lane, S. D., Kjome, K. L., & Moeller, F. G. (2011). Neuropsychiatry of aggression. Neurologic Clinics, 29(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2010.10.006

Malone, R. P., Bennett, D. S., Luebbert, J. F., Rowan, A. B., Biesecker, K. A., Blaney, B. L., & Delaney, M. A. (1998). Aggression classification and treatment response. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 34(1), 41–45.

Murphy, C. M., & Richards, T. N. (2021). The efficacy of psychosocial interventions for partner violent individuals. In Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan: A project of the National Partnership to End Interpersonal Violence Across the Lifespan (NPEIV) (S. 3417–3444). Springer.

Neukel, C., Bertsch, K., Wenigmann, M., Spieß, K., Krauch, M., Steinmann, S., & Herpertz, S. C. (2021). A Mechanism-Based Approach to Anti-Aggression Psychotherapy in Borderline Personality Disorder: Group Treatment Affects Amygdala Activation and Connectivity. Brain Sciences, 11(12), 1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121627

Pascual-Leone, A., & Paivio, S. C. (2013). Emotion-focused therapy for anger in complex trauma (E. Fernandez, Hrsg.). Oxford University Press, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199914661.003.0003

Qamar, R., Wang, S. M., Qureshi, F. M., LaChance, L., Kolla, N. J., & Konkolÿ Thege, B. (2023). Nutritional supplementation in the management of childhood/youth aggression: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 71, 101841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2023.101841

Qureshi, F. M., Kunaratnam, N., Kolla, N. J., & Konkolÿ Thege, B. (2021). Nutritional supplementation in the treatment of violent and aggressive behavior: A systematic review. Aggressive Behavior, 47(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21953

Raine, A., Cheney, R. A., Ho, R., Portnoy, J., Liu, J., Soyfer, L., Hibbeln, J., & Richmond, T. S. (2016). Nutritional supplementation to reduce child aggression: a randomized, stratified, single-blind, factorial trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(9), 1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12565

Ramshe, M. Y., Sharafi, R. M., Nazari, M., Mohammadi, A., Ftros, E., & Jafari, J. S. (2023). The effectiveness of schema therapy on aggression and emotion dysregulation in adolescent girls with self-harm. Shahroud Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(1), 42–46.

Sabet, V. H., Shahrestani, N. R., akbar Hemmati Sabet & Ahmadpanah, M. (2016). The Effectiveness of Schema Therapy in Reducing Aggression and Social Anxiety in Adolescents of Hamedan city aged 17 to 18 years. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 3, 82–93. https://shenakht.muk.ac.ir/article-1-240-en.html

Sigrist, C., Bechdolf, A., Bertsch, K., Bullenkamp, R., Busse, M., Darrelmann, U. g., Dempfle, A., Driessen, M., Frodl, T., Kersting, J.-M., Kesik, J., Matzke, B., Neukel, C., Niessen, E., Nückel, S., Oertel, V., Padberg, F., Philipsen, A., Pink, D., . . . Herpertz, S. C. (2025). A mechanism-based group psychotherapy approach to aggressive behavior (MAAP) in borderline personality disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials, 26, 265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08985-6

SRF, S. R. u. F. (2024, 6. Oktober). Sternstunde Philosophie: Wie lässt sich der Kreislauf von Trauma und Gewalt durchbrechen? Verfügbar 10. August 2025 unter https://medien.srf.ch/-/-sternstunde-philosophie-wie-lasst-sich-der-kreislauf-von-trauma-und-gewalt-durchbrechen-

Steffgen, G. (2017). Anger Management - Evaluation of a Cognitive-Behavioral Training Program for Table Tennis Players. Journal of Human Kinetics, 55, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0006

Steinert, T., & Hirsch, S. (2020). S3-Leitlinie Verhinderung von Zwang: Prävention und Therapie aggressiven Verhaltens bei Erwachsenen. Der Nervenarzt, 91(7), 611–616.

Sukhodolsky, D. G., Kassinove, H., & Gorman, B. S. (2004). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(3), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.005

Turner, D. T., Riedel, E., Kobeissi, L. H., Karyotaki, E., Garcia-Moreno, C., Say, L., & Cuijpers, P. (2020). Psychosocial interventions for intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Global Health, 10(1), 010409. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.010409

Utami, Y. A. H., & Yudiarso, A. (2023). The effect of mindfulness on aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/psikologika.vol28.iss1.art4

Zarling, A., Lawrence, E., & Marchman, J. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for aggressive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037946

Zhang, K., Hu, X., Ma, L., Xie, Q., Wang, Z., Fan, C., & Li, X. (2023). The efficacy of schema therapy for personality disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 77(7), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2023.2228304